|
|
| zzz-new topic test
| Posted by peter on 2007-10-16 (message id=3046 )
|
| zzz-new topic test
| Posted by Peter on 2007-10-16 (message id=3045 )
|
| zzz-new topic test
| Posted by Peter on 2007-10-16 (message id=3044 )
|
| zzz-new topic test
| Posted by Peter on 2007-10-16 (message id=3043 )
|
| zzz-new topic test
| Posted by Peter on 2007-10-16 (message id=3042 )
|
| zzz-new topic test
| Posted by peter on 2007-10-16 (message id=3041 )
|
| zzz-new topic test
| Posted by Peter on 2007-10-16 (message id=3040 )
|
| zzz-new topic test
| Posted by Peter on 2007-10-16 (message id=3039 )
|
| zzz-new topic test
| Posted by Peter on 2007-10-16 (message id=3038 )
|
| zzz-new topic test
| Posted by Peter on 2007-10-16 (message id=3037 )
|
| zzz-new topic test
| Posted by Peter on 2007-10-16 (message id=3036 )
|
| zzz-new topic test
| Posted by Peter on 2007-10-16 (message id=3035 )
|
| zzz-new topic test
| Posted by Peter on 2007-10-16 (message id=3034 )
|
| zzz-new topic test
| Posted by Peter on 2007-10-16 (message id=3033 )
|
| zzz-new topic test
| Posted by on 2007-10-16 (message id=3032 )
|
| zzz-new topic test
| Posted by on 2007-10-16 (message id=3031 )
|
| Ultrasonic Transducer veggie oil, produces plasma
| Posted by ea2233 on 2007-09-07 (message id=2957 )
|
http//video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-641221540345626139&q=ultrasonic&total=625&start=10&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=9
She gets the reaction within the first minute. It is a 4 minute clip
Notice the color of the flame they clearly have a plasma from atomized veggie oil combusting in a 22.5 khz sound field. 25 watts. It seems pretty straight forward that one could produce stable plasma this way. Of course this example is highly unscientific. You can hear the sound of the plama arc. She take the wave guide dips it is veggitable oil and then heats it in a candle. Once the reaction starts she is able to carry the white plama off the candle away from the candle flame.
--
See more of this discussion:Ultrasonic Transducer veggie oil, produces plasma
| Post a reply to this message, or post a new topic |  |
|
| Re: Marcus device
| Posted by Francisco Liszt Nunes Jr on 2007-06-29 (message id=2982 )
|
Hello Marcus!
I think you will have funds to get the invention antigravity to make succces!
The problem is to get the correct compannies, aviation compannies are the most probably interested the petroleuym companny not, its only to get the correct colaboration and with Jesus Christ you will get !
From Brazil!
I would like tp know better your tests with inertia changing!
Thanks!
See more of this discussion:Re: Marcus device
| Post a reply to this message, or post a new topic |  |
|
| Heat of reactions for nitric acid
| Posted by Asad Meer on 2007-06-01 (message id=2789 )
|
Dear,
I have been searching for the heat of reaction for the production of Nitric acid from Ammonia and Air through Ostwald Process i.e.,
4NH3 + 5O2 -----(1-8atm)---(catalyst)----> 4NO + 6H2O
dH = -903 KJ/Mol
2NO + O2 ----------------------> 2NO2
dH = -116.3 KJ/mol
At lower temparature : 2NO2 --------------------> N2O4
3NO2 + H2O -----------------------------> 2HNO3 + NO
dH = -134,7 KJ/mol
All I had found that the heat of reactions are given in KJ/Mol.
I just want to know that these heats are per Mol of what one of the reactants (such NH3 in the first reaction) or the Products (such as NO in th first reaction). I also want to know, that either these Mols are g-Mols, Kg-Mols or lb-Mols.
Thanks!
:)
See more of this discussion:Heat of reactions for nitric acid
| Post a reply to this message, or post a new topic |  |
|
| Re: Tornado in a petri dish
| Posted by Michael Gmirkin on 2007-02-13 (message id=2893 )
|
| Re Welcome
| Posted by Peter on 2006-11-20 (message id=2935 )
|
| Re Welcome
| Posted by Peter on 2006-11-20 (message id=2934 )
|
| Re Welcome
| Posted by Peter on 2006-11-20 (message id=2933 )
|
| Re Welcome
| Posted by Peter on 2006-11-20 (message id=2932 )
|
| Re Welcome
| Posted by Peter on 2006-11-18 (message id=2956 )
|
This is difficult to measure because the standard instrumentation for measuring a magnetic field is based on a Hall effect device. This assumes no charge gradient. The charge sheath clearly has a high charge, so Hall effect devices cannot be used.
Magnetic recording devices tend not to work when use with instrumentation in a tornado - this could be because the magnetic fields are much higher than expected.
See more of this discussion:Re Welcome
| Post a reply to this message, or post a new topic |  |
|
| zzz-new topic test
| Posted by Peter on 2006-11-18 (message id=2931 )
|
| Question
| Posted by Mike on 2006-11-08 (message id=2955 )
|
|
Hey, my name is Mike and am a student at CMU. I wanted to know how many times more intense is a charge sheath vortex's magnetic field in comparison with earth's?
See more of this discussion:Question
| Post a reply to this message, or post a new topic |  |
|
| Re A ring plasma (non-vortex
| Posted by Tesladownunder on 2006-07-30 (message id=2890 )
|
I should be able to create a 3-6 inch ring plasma from an exploding wire at perhaps 2-4kJ. At these levels the fine wire that forms the initial path explodes apparently uniformly rather than segmentally. The two ends of the wire will be forced together due to the forces acting on the coil of axial compression and radial expansion and short circuit the ring. So a ring with perhaps 50kA is formed which will (I presume) expand rapidly and dissipate.
I can put this in a field of perhaps 0.5 - 1 Tesla (70kg electromagnet).
Any suggestions/predictions?
Peter
http://tesladownunder.com/Pulse_Power.htm
See more of this discussion:Re A ring plasma (non-vortex
| Post a reply to this message, or post a new topic |  |
|
| calza nere
| Posted by calza nere on 2006-06-26 (message id=2914 )
|
| Retornado and ozone
| Posted by Peter on 2006-04-25 (message id=2839 )
|
Electrical discharges from the tops of thunderstorms may help to regenerate ozone in the upper atmosphere. These may be more intense above a tornado.
This is one positive effect from the tornado.
Peter
See more of this discussion:Retornado and ozone
| Post a reply to this message, or post a new topic |  |
| |