Discussion of the Charge Sheath Vortex
Message Board:
See the charge sheath vortex theoryPlease check if a topic already exists before starting a new topic. New Topic
All Messages by Topic:
| Your work product is elegant in its simplicity | Posted by TrueEarth |
|
Just found your website and I'm blown away. I, too, am not a scientist. But my specialty is being an "expert on experts." And I think I may have found the expert on physics!
My intuition tells me that you may well have found the Unified Field Theory that Einstein and several generations of physicists couldn’t find because of their erroneous assumptions about gravity and the nucleus. Your explanation for how the physics of the Universe actually works "in the real world" is elegant in its simplicity and profound in the totality of its meaning! I recently had the idea, myself, that "It's all electricity" may be the Physics Model that is correct. It just seems 'strange' that there is a mysterious, unknown 'Strong Force' in the nucleus which overrides the electrical charge of the protons, etc. I am publishing a book in two weeks on Amazon and was writing a chapter on Physics as it relates to the Earth - when I "accidentally" stumbled upon your work. If I can get verification from some physicists and mathematicians that all of your foundational facts, assumptions and laws are correct then I am ready to "officially" accept your Unified Theory which my heart already tells me is true! I've sent this link to a physicist friend of mine, hoping he will evaluate your data and conclusions. Being a believer in The Law of Parsimony, I've always had the gut feeling that most of particle physics , astrophysics and cosmology is B.S. Assuming I can quickly come to understand and accept your theory, then I would like to reference it in my book. Thank You for your work; and for providing this Forum to communicate and learn more about this. - Bruce Hendler Bellingham, Washington USA [My Amazon, Facebook, MySpace & Twitter 'nick' is TrueEarth See more of this discussion:Your work product is elegant in its simplicity
|
| Hurricanes and eddy currents | Posted by Steve |
|
You are so right. I think it is likely that hurricanes having rotating charges will induce eddy currents in the warm salt water. Warmer water being more conductive this would be more noticeable in the tropics. The eddy currents should support the hurricane and keep it out of electrical contact with the water, allowing it to float over the ocean and accumulate energy. When hitting the continetal shelf the eddy currents would not reach as deep and the hurricane would dump it's charge. feel free to add this to your work if you think it has merit. I do not understand why tornados sometimes do not touch down, but I will read through your work as time permits. there must be a similar mechanism. Thanks
Steve See more of this discussion:Hurricanes and eddy currents
|
| Ultrasonic Transducer veggie oil, produces plasma | Posted by ea2233 |
|
http//video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-641221540345626139&q=ultrasonic&total=625&start=10&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=9
She gets the reaction within the first minute. It is a 4 minute clip Notice the color of the flame they clearly have a plasma from atomized veggie oil combusting in a 22.5 khz sound field. 25 watts. It seems pretty straight forward that one could produce stable plasma this way. Of course this example is highly unscientific. You can hear the sound of the plama arc. She take the wave guide dips it is veggitable oil and then heats it in a candle. Once the reaction starts she is able to carry the white plama off the candle away from the candle flame. -- See more of this discussion:Ultrasonic Transducer veggie oil, produces plasma
|
| Re: Marcus device | Posted by Francisco Liszt Nunes Jr |
|
Hello Marcus!
I think you will have funds to get the invention antigravity to make succces! The problem is to get the correct compannies, aviation compannies are the most probably interested the petroleuym companny not, its only to get the correct colaboration and with Jesus Christ you will get ! From Brazil! I would like tp know better your tests with inertia changing! Thanks! See more of this discussion:Re: Marcus device
|
| Heat of reactions for nitric acid | Posted by Asad Meer |
|
Dear,
I have been searching for the heat of reaction for the production of Nitric acid from Ammonia and Air through Ostwald Process i.e., 4NH3 + 5O2 -----(1-8atm)---(catalyst)----> 4NO + 6H2O dH = -903 KJ/Mol 2NO + O2 ----------------------> 2NO2 dH = -116.3 KJ/mol At lower temparature : 2NO2 --------------------> N2O4 3NO2 + H2O -----------------------------> 2HNO3 + NO dH = -134,7 KJ/mol All I had found that the heat of reactions are given in KJ/Mol. I just want to know that these heats are per Mol of what one of the reactants (such NH3 in the first reaction) or the Products (such as NO in th first reaction). I also want to know, that either these Mols are g-Mols, Kg-Mols or lb-Mols. Thanks! :) See more of this discussion:Heat of reactions for nitric acid
|
| Re: Tornado in a petri dish | Posted by Michael Gmirkin |
|
Hmm, seems the previous poster was not serious, seeing as it's 4 years later and no desktop fusion as yet... *wink*
See more of this discussion:Re: Tornado in a petri dish
|
| Re Welcome | Posted by Peter |
|
This is difficult to measure because the standard instrumentation for measuring a magnetic field is based on a Hall effect device. This assumes no charge gradient. The charge sheath clearly has a high charge, so Hall effect devices cannot be used.
Magnetic recording devices tend not to work when use with instrumentation in a tornado - this could be because the magnetic fields are much higher than expected. See more of this discussion:Re Welcome
|
| Question | Posted by Mike |
|
Hey, my name is Mike and am a student at CMU. I wanted to know how many times more intense is a charge sheath vortex's magnetic field in comparison with earth's?
See more of this discussion:Question
|
| Re A ring plasma (non-vortex | Posted by Tesladownunder |
|
I should be able to create a 3-6 inch ring plasma from an exploding wire at perhaps 2-4kJ. At these levels the fine wire that forms the initial path explodes apparently uniformly rather than segmentally. The two ends of the wire will be forced together due to the forces acting on the coil of axial compression and radial expansion and short circuit the ring. So a ring with perhaps 50kA is formed which will (I presume) expand rapidly and dissipate.
I can put this in a field of perhaps 0.5 - 1 Tesla (70kg electromagnet). Any suggestions/predictions? Peter http://tesladownunder.com/Pulse_Power.htm See more of this discussion:Re A ring plasma (non-vortex
|
| calza nere | Posted by calza nere |
|
http://ciwux.itpagina.info calza nere
See more of this discussion:calza nere
|
| Retornado and ozone | Posted by Peter |
|
Electrical discharges from the tops of thunderstorms may help to regenerate ozone in the upper atmosphere. These may be more intense above a tornado.
This is one positive effect from the tornado. Peter See more of this discussion:Retornado and ozone
|
| Tornadoes and Our Environment | Posted by Christie Hale |
|
Do tornadoes contribute to the problem with the ozone layer and the green house effect? If so, then how.
See more of this discussion:Tornadoes and Our Environment
|
| Re Welcome | Posted by Peter |
|
Thanks for that reference.
Mr Michaud's vortex would, I think fail to generate any power. It is true that power can be generated by collecting the suns heat in extensive plastic grenhouses, and generating power as this air rises up through a tall tower. Mr Michaud thinks that by creating a vortex he can dispense with the enclosing tower. I would suggest that without the charge sheath of a tornado, his rising vortex will have no coherence, so there is no mechanism to transmit the energy released as the warm air rises back to his turbines at the base. There is also no way of causing the turbulence vortex at ground level to grow upwards and stay attached to his base. If he were correct then dust devils would naturally grow into tornados, and grow upwards into the sky to create storm clouds, but the opposite is observed. A tornado is observed to form in a spinning storm cloud and then extend both upwards and downwards along the axis of the storms spin. A tornado will descend into a strong lateral air flow at ground level and still remain coherent. Peter See more of this discussion:Re Welcome
|
| Artificial tornadoes as energy sources | Posted by Nic M |
|
Peter
You may be intersted in this article from "the Economist" discussing the potential of using artificially generated tornadoes to drive turbines for power generation. http//www.economist.com/science/displayStory.cfm?story_id=4455446 See more of this discussion:Artificial tornadoes as energy sources
|
| Re Thank you for the Invitation | Posted by Bill Robinson |
|
Hello--I also need to procure 22" aluminum hemispheres of about this thickness--actually I need a sphere, but am assuming my local machine shop could weld the two together; do you use a weldable alloy?
Could you let me know how much you might charge to spin a couple of hemispheres? I also need one of thicker aluminum (minimum 1/8", more likely 1/4") with 24" i.d.; can you spin something like this also? I have a quote from a shop that makes stock aluminum hemispheres 1/4" thick. Thanx! bill See more of this discussion:Re Thank you for the Invitation
|
| Re: Welcome | Posted by Peter |
|
Welcome to the updated board.
Peter See more of this discussion:Re: Welcome
|
| Re: Additionally | Posted by Peter |
|
I read wally's paper with interest when he published it - and we have been in correspondence. To quote from his paper: "It is proposed here that the driving source of the tornado is a toroidal electric current field (or a partially toroidal field) that may be generated by the apparently random atmospherics of some storms, and its interaction with the earth's magnetic field. The toroidal electric current in this static electric field is very similar to the vorticity toroidal field. If the core of the tornado is considered to be the core of the electric current toroid, the reduced pressure in the core would tend to increase the electric current density (J) due to the increase in air conductivity. Air conductivity increases as the air pressure falls. The inflow (or outflow) of current, in air, to the base of the tornado core is almost at right angles to the earth's magnetic field and the interaction of the two provides a tangential J x B force" Yes there is a lot of common ground - particularly in our dissatisfaction of the conventional explanations. However I haven't seen the concept of the charge sheath proposed anywhere else. Should anyone know of any prior publications and discussion I would be grateful for the references. Peter See more of this discussion:Re: Additionally
|
| Re: Experiments update | Posted by |
|
Sir, i would like to know method to make bismuth powder. pl revet back See more of this discussion:Re: Experiments update
|
| Re: Your work product is elegant in its simplicity | Posted by dustin |
|
I know i'm back tracking a bit ,to the first entry in fact, but I think that you shouldn't totally through away the Idea of a mercury powered engine because isn't it true that mercury would be the easiest metal to turn into a plasma
See more of this discussion:Re: Your work product is elegant in its simplicity
|
| Re: DUST VORTEXES FORMATION IN THE NUCLEAR - INDUCED PLASMA | Posted by |
|
Man is a spirit within a body, and therefore man thinks outside of his body also, which means that man does not think with the so called "brain", because outside of the physical human body the person has not the "brain". Also, physical particles do not have a "self-knowledge", or "self-recognition" therefore, because man does have a self-knowledge and self-recognition man is not physical and does not think with a physical mechanism (aka, brain). Sincerely, TRUTH, Jonathan See more of this discussion:Re: DUST VORTEXES FORMATION IN THE NUCLEAR - INDUCED PLASMA
|